Hyperliquid and Binance clash over liquidations during Oct crash, raising questions about exchange transparency and market structure

What happened?

Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff Yan accused centralized exchanges like Binance of underreporting user liquidations during the Oct. 10–11 market crash. Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao pushed back, saying Binance and BNBChain partners spent hundreds of millions to protect users and denying current ties to Hyperliquid. The dispute came after a huge liquidation cascade that wiped out leveraged positions, with Hyperliquid reporting large on-chain volumes while some Binance users experienced temporary outages.

Who does this affect?

Traders who were liquidated or couldn’t close positions during the crash are the most directly affected. Centralized and decentralized exchanges, along with their teams, face increased scrutiny over transparency and reliability. Broader market participants—investors, liquidity providers, and regulators—also feel the impact because it shapes trust and future behavior in the crypto ecosystem.

Why does this matter?

If CEXs underreport liquidations or suffer outages, it can amplify losses, spike volatility, and erode trust in centralized platforms. Greater on-chain transparency from venues like Hyperliquid could draw more trading activity to DEXs and change where liquidity concentrates. That shift could reshape market structure, affect price stability, and influence where capital flows during future market stress.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *